Comparison of the sparsity (percentage of zero coefficients) of solutions when L1 and L2 penalty are used for different values of C. We can see that large values of C give more freedom to the model. Conversely, smaller values of C constrain the model more. In the L1 penalty case, this leads to sparser solutions.
We classify 8x8 images of digits into two classes: 0-4 against 5-9. The visualization shows coefficients of the models for varying C.
Out:
C=100.00 Sparsity with L1 penalty: 6.25% score with L1 penalty: 0.9104 Sparsity with L2 penalty: 4.69% score with L2 penalty: 0.9098 C=1.00 Sparsity with L1 penalty: 10.94% score with L1 penalty: 0.9104 Sparsity with L2 penalty: 4.69% score with L2 penalty: 0.9093 C=0.01 Sparsity with L1 penalty: 85.94% score with L1 penalty: 0.8614 Sparsity with L2 penalty: 4.69% score with L2 penalty: 0.8915
print(__doc__) # Authors: Alexandre Gramfort <[email protected]> # Mathieu Blondel <[email protected]> # Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> # License: BSD 3 clause import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression from sklearn import datasets from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler digits = datasets.load_digits() X, y = digits.data, digits.target X = StandardScaler().fit_transform(X) # classify small against large digits y = (y > 4).astype(np.int) # Set regularization parameter for i, C in enumerate((100, 1, 0.01)): # turn down tolerance for short training time clf_l1_LR = LogisticRegression(C=C, penalty='l1', tol=0.01) clf_l2_LR = LogisticRegression(C=C, penalty='l2', tol=0.01) clf_l1_LR.fit(X, y) clf_l2_LR.fit(X, y) coef_l1_LR = clf_l1_LR.coef_.ravel() coef_l2_LR = clf_l2_LR.coef_.ravel() # coef_l1_LR contains zeros due to the # L1 sparsity inducing norm sparsity_l1_LR = np.mean(coef_l1_LR == 0) * 100 sparsity_l2_LR = np.mean(coef_l2_LR == 0) * 100 print("C=%.2f" % C) print("Sparsity with L1 penalty: %.2f%%" % sparsity_l1_LR) print("score with L1 penalty: %.4f" % clf_l1_LR.score(X, y)) print("Sparsity with L2 penalty: %.2f%%" % sparsity_l2_LR) print("score with L2 penalty: %.4f" % clf_l2_LR.score(X, y)) l1_plot = plt.subplot(3, 2, 2 * i + 1) l2_plot = plt.subplot(3, 2, 2 * (i + 1)) if i == 0: l1_plot.set_title("L1 penalty") l2_plot.set_title("L2 penalty") l1_plot.imshow(np.abs(coef_l1_LR.reshape(8, 8)), interpolation='nearest', cmap='binary', vmax=1, vmin=0) l2_plot.imshow(np.abs(coef_l2_LR.reshape(8, 8)), interpolation='nearest', cmap='binary', vmax=1, vmin=0) plt.text(-8, 3, "C = %.2f" % C) l1_plot.set_xticks(()) l1_plot.set_yticks(()) l2_plot.set_xticks(()) l2_plot.set_yticks(()) plt.show()
Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 0.740 seconds)
plot_logistic_l1_l2_sparsity.py
plot_logistic_l1_l2_sparsity.ipynb
© 2007–2016 The scikit-learn developers
Licensed under the 3-clause BSD License.
http://scikit-learn.org/stable/auto_examples/linear_model/plot_logistic_l1_l2_sparsity.html